Saturday, 24 September 2022

EXPLAIN JOHN'S STATEMENTTHAT ' WHOEVER DOES NOT LOVE ABIDES IN DEATH' AS SEEN IN 1 JOHN 3:14-18 IN THE LIGHT OF THE DOCTRINE OF SIN

 INTRODUCTION

There are three things that eternally abide: faith, hope and love, but the greatest is ‘divine’ love. The issue of love is of great essence to God. It forms the greatest commandments to all believers as indicated in Matthew 22:37-39. “Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind”. This is the first and the greatest commandment. And the second is like it: “Love your neighbor as yourself”. The love of God and love of others as indicated above, are the greatest commandments and the basis of true Christian life, responsibility and divine revelation. It is out of love that we extend help to others; it is out of love that we protect and support others. Love does not keep records of wrongs. However, in the absence of love, evil thrives. In other words, whenever a vacuum is created which is unoccupied by love, room is created for evil to exist. When we do not love, we are inclined to hurt, to steal from others and capable of murder and all manner of sin. When we do not allow ourselves to be loved, we ourselves are bereft of love and what we do not have, we cannot give; therefore, making us susceptible to evil ideas against people and all around us. And as the Bible says, “we will be dead through trespasses and sin” when we do not and cannot love. It is within this scope that I will in this paper, attempt to explain John’s statement that “whoever does not love abides in death” in the light of the doctrine of sin. 

EXEGESIS OF 1 JOHN 3:14-18

In 1 John 3:14-18 John admonishes believers to love one another. In verse 14, John draws the attention of the believer to some of the things that become obvious when one comes to the saving knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ. He confirms that a believer becomes aware of the new life in Christ Jesus as a result of the changes in the relationship with his fellow brother and his love for Christ and His commandments. That is the real testimony of a regenerated life. He continues in verse 15 by indicating that without love towards a brother, hatred is manifested.  John then repeats Jesus saying in Matthew 5:21-22 that “whoever hates another person is a murderer at heart”. He goes on to remind the believer that Christianity is relational and is a religion of the heart. Also, the outward expression alone is not enough, it requires love towards the brethren.  He explains in verse 17 that love is sharing and being generous with each other. Love seeks the welfare of others and extends a hand to the poor in the community of faith just as Christ laid down His life for us. Christians are therefore to participate in the life of others “to encourage love and good works” among the family of believers.  Further in verse 18, John laid emphasis on showing of love not only in words, but “in deed and in truth” as stated in James 2:14-17 “what doth it profit, my brethren though a man say he has faith, and have not works?”. James in this passage defines true faith as faith that works and John also defines true love as love that works. As believers, when we truly appreciate God for what he has done for us, then in acknowledgment and thanksgiving we ought to share the same love with others. In the light of the above summary, I will proceed to look at the concept of sin.

WHAT IS SIN?

According to Shirley C. Guthrie, “the basic truth is not that we are sinners, but that we are human beings created in God’s image”. However, man is confronted “with self-contradictions, which make life so hard to understand and live”. There are constant contradictions of the truth, distortions, corruption; indeed sin has invaded every part of our nature our mind, will, affections, conscience imagination and disposition. But this does not mean that we cannot tell right from wrong, or do things that are pleasant and helpful. But our limitations stems from the fact that “The human heart is most deceitful of all things and desperately wicked”. We are defiled “for from within, out of men’s hearts, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, greed, malice, deceit, lewdness, envy, slander arrogance and folly”. It is worth noting that the list includes thoughts, words and actions. This shows that before God, anything we say, think or do that is less than perfect is sin.  Sin can therefore be defined as “to miss the mark” the Greek word is Harmartia. This word is used to refer to both the power of sin and its fruits as indicated in James 4:17. Sin is also defined as “not able to do God’s will” and “living in immorality”. John Blanchard also defines sin as “anything that fails to meet God’s perfect standard”. The Bible presents us with many definitions of sin. In Prov. 24:9 scripture states that “the thought of foolishness is sin”. In John 3:4, “sin is the transgression of the Law”. James 4:17 teaches that “to him that knoweth to do good and doeth it not to him it is sin”. The Greek word, Parakoe, also used in the Bible to describe sin means “neglect to hear”, which displays a careless attitude towards the word of God or His commandments. There are other Hebrew translations in the Old Testament as well; for example chattah means “an offence”. Pawsah also means to break away from just authority, trespass, revolt or quarrel.  All these definitions point to the self-contradictions that come about as a result of sin. To further deepen our understanding on the self-destructive nature of sin we will look at the three basic forms of sin as espoused by Shirley C. Guthrie. 

THE THREE BASIC FORMS OF SIN

One of the basic forms of sin is “sin as disobedience”. It is obvious that the source of all destruction, disunity, disharmony, discomfort, disengagement, desertion, disaster, disability, disorder, discouragement, distress and disintegration, are the result of one single act of disobedience. “Sin as disobedience” is described by Shirley as disobedience to the law of God. He further explains that the law of God requires complete surrendering of self to the benefit of God and love for the neighbor. Moreover, sin as disobedience is not just doing bad things, but withholding love to God and to mankind or not doing what love requires. It can also mean that we exhibit love which we really do not mean, or worshipping ourselves though we pretend to worship God; or using the name of God in vain and pretending to love others or withholding good from others. As in some Jewish thought, withholding goods from someone in need is equivalent to starving him or her. The true Christian is to show sacrificial and unconditional love towards others daily; failure to so and depriving others of that love is murder. 

The other form of sin Shirley espoused is “Sin as sensuality”. It is also interesting to note that most often; we relate the idea of sin to adultery, fornication, drunkenness among others. These are described as sin; “worldly or fleshly sin” which results in the gratification of the flesh as stated in Romans 8:13 “for if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die”. Hence, we excuse ourselves from the guilt of sin and blame it on our sinful nature. But as I have indicated above the heart is the source of all sin. The root of the act and its effect on both our fellow man and God is what makes it sinful.  

Shirley Guthrie also talks about ‘Sin as the Desire to be good”. Through one man, sin came into the world. The sin of Adam and Eve reveals the guilt, disobedience, pride, weakness and rebellion of all men. Therefore we inherit sin from Adams through his position as the head of the human race and also through our generational link with him. Therefore, the desire of Adam reflects the desire of all men if placed in the same situation. Man in the Garden of Eden was not content to be dependent of God. Man had a strong urge to be like God, had the desire to know good and evil and therefore could accept the devils liars and went ahead to eat the forbidden fruit; and through this one act man fell. The desire to know good and evil is a rebellion against God; a position that frees man from God’s instructions or correction.  Man fallen nature deprives him of totally eradicating sin from his life. Sin has become a ‘second nature’ which shows its head continually and habitually, though sin is contrary to the nature of one born of God.    

THE JUDGMENT OF SIN

The judgment on sin is plain: sin brings death. Johns saying in 1 John 3:14 is clearly elaborated in Ezekiel 18 as well. The Bible is consistent that the punishment of sin is death both physical and spiritually. Ezekiel 18:4 states that ‘the soul who sin is the one who will die”. Sin is lawlessness; and lawlessness is disobedience to authority and the authority of God. John reflects that the resentment of Cain led to the death of his brother. Cain was consumed with jealousy because of the favour his brother received from God consequently he murdered him.  There are rules for living and God has clearly indicated in his word that love of God and love of man according to Dianne Tidball is “at the heart of the Christian faith”.  The litmus test is love, but the very love also promotes the hatred of those who are evil. The qualities that the people of God display; love integrity, holiness and truth, tend to incites others to be hostile and they tend to dislike those who live by a different principle. This is why Cain could decide to kill his brother because Abel did what was pleasing before God and he received favour.

Hatred of a brother by a brother leads to murder and the one who hates is himself dead. Hatred stems out of self-interest, self-will, greed, lust, pride among others. It is when one is possessed or obsessed with ensuring that his will is done; no matter what is ethical or morally right; any contrary or opposing views have to be removed to make way for his personal will to prevail. In our world today this is happening where people are not able to accommodate each other leading to strives, wars and divorce and murder. Hatred is not just an irritation and frustration with someone because they are not likeable; it is an obsessive desire to eliminate someone because of a deep-seated antagonism to them, say Dianne Tidball. 

Another illustration is Judas Iscariot betrayal of Jesus Christ. Judas out of greed led the crowd to arrest Jesus. After the betrayal, he should have asked for forgiveness but since he did not extend love to his Master initially, and caused his arrest, he also stopped loving himself and that eventually led to his death by suicide. As Guthrie posits ‘sin is not just killing people but having contempt for any human being”. In short, sin is not loving and not being willing to let ourselves be loved. When man is bereft of love then life itself losses it’s meaning to him. To hate, to murder, to be in bad relationship is a characteristics of people living in death. In 1 John 3:10 the Bible tells us that “anyone who does not do what is right is not a child of God; nor is anyone who does not love the brother”. For if we are called to be like Christ, there is no place for sin in our lives. Love is derived from Christ. But no one can exercise the love called for here without learning it from Christ. Jesus love is not conditional. Our willingness to share indicates whether or not we have the love of God. Genuine love is not only by words but with action and in truth. Words and actions are instruments that can be used to express love. Words on their own are not enough; the call to love in truth indicate that our actions and our words must not simply be formalities or attempts to appear in good light but must reflect sincere concern for the one we love. In Romans 13:8 we read that the only debt a believer should owe his neighbor is the love and that love is the fulfillment of the law. He that loveth another hath fulfilled the law. The Lord is saying to us that doing does not count, loving motivates it.

Love worketh no ill against the neighbour which means that love is not abstract sentiment, it is a  concrete reality that takes active form in the treatment of those around us. Love is patient, kind and does not envy, it is not self-seeking and above all does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. Love shows whether we belong to the sphere of the truth or the sphere of lies. For the essence of truth is Jesus himself, who said I am the way the truth and the life and to exercise love confirms whether we live in Christ and he in us. If we live in Christ, then just as he laid down his life for us so we also have to lay down our lives for others. 

CONCLUSION

It is worth noting that sin is never eradicated from the life of the believer, human beings are prone to sin. It is the Holy Spirit that is given so that the believer may not let sin reign in his body. The temptation of the world, the devil and the flesh are constant and powerful but they are not stronger than God. When we are confronted with issues that will lead us to sin, we have to utilize the power of God in our lives and God’s provision in scriptures to overcome the world. We need each other and love is very central to communal living. We need to transform our societies, meet the need of others and touch lives. If we do not love we will not be able to do any of these. If we do not love we will be depriving others of the goodness of life. The absence of self-giving, sacrificial love is an indication of someone who is separated from God and remains spiritually dead, with no hope of eternal life. Certainly, judgment awaits every act of sin according to the principle that whatever a man sows he will reap.  

Bibliography

Blanchard, John, Ultimate Questions (Darlington: Evangelical Press, 1987).


Conner, Kevin J., The Foundations of Christian Doctrine: A practical guide to Christian Belief (Oregon: City Bible Publishing,1989).


Dianne, Tidball, Discovering John’s Letters (Leicester: Crossway Books, 2002).

Dickson, Roger, Dickson Teachers Bible (Cape Town: Africa International Missions, 2011).  


Eugene, Boring M., & Fred B. Craddock, (eds.) The Peoples, New Testament Commentary (Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2004). 


Guthrie, Shirley C., Christian Doctrine (Louisville; Westminster/John Knox Press, 1994).


Pfeiffer, Charles F., Howard F. Vos  & John Rea, (eds.) Wycliff Bible Dictionary ( Peabody: 

Hendrickson Publishers,2008).


Williams, Morris, Declare His Righteousness (Springfield:  Morris Williams, 1975).


Wireko, Vicky, ‘Unpardonable Cruelties that have enveloped us’, in The Daily Graphic (Vol. 19777, May 27, 2015), p. 7.

.





Thursday, 12 May 2022

JESUS or JUDAS? The Legacy of J.J. Rawlings and the Democratization of Ghana

JESUS or JUDAS? The Legacy of J.J. Rawlings and the Democratization of Ghana: His passing one year ago triggered debate about his role in the birth and development of Ghana’s Fourth Republic. But Rawlings’ legacy in Ghana’s democratic development deserves a longer view that goes back to before the Third Republic. Indeed, it merits a broader view that takes full measure of the man and his net impact on Ghanaian ethos that has left him a savior to some and traitor to others.

Friday, 28 May 2021

 MENSTRUAL HEALTH AND HYGIENE DAY 2021

Theme: Action and Investment in menstrual hygiene and health


Today, the world is observing menstrual health and hygiene day. Hurray!!!!.

Women and girls bleed every day and it is very important to talk about it because menstruation is very important to the existence of the human race.

Each month a woman, a girl, bleeds, her body is being prepared to bring a life into this world. Each month a woman menstruates it is possible she might carry out pregnancy. Therefore, the importance of celebrating a day like this cannot be overemphasized.

The date May 28 was chosen to observe the day because on an average the menstrual cycle for most women is 28 days and the menstruation period for most women is for five days. Therefore, 28/5 was kept as the day for raising awareness on menstrual health and hygiene.  

Women all over the world face a lot of challenges and difficulties- from taboo, to social stigma, from discrimination, to exclusion against women and girls, from fear to shame and inhibitions, because through no fault of theirs they are bleeding.

In a tweet the United nation wrote that “Menstrual health is a human right” Not only is it human rights, it is a natural biological process for procreation to be ongoing and as such should be dear to the heart of every group of people, race and tribe.

Menstruation is not dirty, it is not evil, it is not nasty; it is just a natural function of the human body.

Do you know that girls drop out of school due to lack of accessible menstrual hygiene facilities, pain and discomfort associated with periods?

Do you know that having your period can lead to child marriages, sexual violation and abuse?

Do you know that women in some countries opt for hysterectomy to remove their wombs to stop menstruating that causes absence from work?

Do you know that the stigma associated with periods and poverty leads to poor hygiene among a large section of rural women and girls who use leaves, dirty rags, wood husk, paper and other such materials instead of sanitary napkins during their periods?

Do you know that some women are driven out of their homes and even their communities during their periods?

Do you know that there are still taboos that deprive women from cooking for their husbands and touching anything in their homes during periods?

Do you know that in some communities women in their periods are not allowed to go to the river for water?

What then can we all do?

Talk, period! Educate, create awareness, communicate about periods, it is not a dirty thing to talk about.

Advocate for countries to invest in menstrual health by making sanitary supplies free for girls or tax-free to help fight period poverty.

Support the campaign, support a woman, support a girl to have a healthy menstrual life. It could be a pad a month for a school girl in your neighborhood or advocate for the provision of hygienic facilities for women and girls in the community, at school at the workplace and in homes.

Join us to celebrate a girl in her period, celebrate your wife as she goes through the monthly cycle. Let’s join hands with women and girls all over the world to celebrate this day about periods.

Women and girls are to report any disorder in their cycle to a health personnel, abnormalities could be signs of other medical conditions, (eg. Uterine Fibroids). Early diagnosis and treatment is advisable.

“Living with dignity is a human right that be preserved". PERIOD!

Saturday, 2 May 2020

GOSPEL AND CULTURE. HOW DID PAUL RESOLVE THE ISSUE OF GOSPEL-CULTURE ENCOUNTER WITH RESPECT TO FOOD SACRIFICED TO IDOLS IN 1 CORINTHIANS 8:1-13? HOW SIGNIFICANT ARE THE ISSUES FOR PASTORAL MINISTRY IN AFRICA? Written by: Pastor Elizabeth Korasare, MA



GOSPEL AND CULTURE. 
HOW DID PAUL RESOLVE THE ISSUE OF GOSPEL-CULTURE ENCOUNTERS WITH RESPECT TO FOOD SACRIFICED TO IDOLS IN 1 CORINTHIANS 8:1-13?
HOW SIGNIFICANT ARE THE ISSUES FOR PASTORAL MINISTRY IN AFRICA?
Written by: Pastor Elizabeth Korasare, MA

INTRODUCTION
The article seeks to look at gospel and culture and how Paul resolved the opposing views between gospel and culture regarding food sacrificed to idols in 1 Corinthians 8:1-13 and how this issue impacts on pastoral ministry in Africa.
The definition of the gospel, is normally oversimplified to mean ‘the teachings and revelation of Christ’[1] or the Good News that is preached to people. Culture on the other hand is defined as the way of life and social organization of a particular country or a group of people. [2] The meaning and scope of these two words cannot be fully exhausted if defined in such simple terms. This paper will therefore look at a more holistic definition of the term gospel and culture.
WHAT IS GOSPEL?
According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, the word gospel is derived from the Anglo-Saxon term ‘god-spell’ meaning ‘good story’. It is the translation of the Greek word euangelion[3] meaning ‘a good message’. In the New Testament, euangelion becomes the technical word for the message of Good News offered to all men through faith in Christ Jesus. The gospel/Good News is a gift from God.[4] Paul writes in Galatians 1:6-11, that the Gospel of God is His revelation and not a discovery, and that there is no other Gospel apart from the Gospel of Christ.
Over the years, a series of Ecumenical council conferences have taken place to find a working definition of the gospel. At the fifth assembly of the World Council of Churches (WCC) in Nairobi in 1975, the gospel was defined as:
the good news from God, our creator and Redeemer…the announcement of God’s kingdom and love through Jesus Christ, the offer of grace and forgiveness of sins, the invitation to repentance and faith in him… the responsibility to participate in the struggle for justice and human dignity’.[5]

This definition from the WCC is more of a person and church-oriented understanding which maintains the traditional definition of evangelism[6] - reaching out to people with the message of redemption and calling them to repentance. It also includes the dimension that seeks to address justice and human rights, therefore integrating the gospel into all aspects of human life.
Kwame Bediako succinctly describes the gospel as ‘who Christ is, and what he means, in his person, his life on earth, his work, his death, his resurrection and its aftermath and how all that concerning him relates to all human beings in all our cultural traditions, histories and environments.[7] In other words, the Gospel relates to human nature at its very core and to human existence in totality. It relates to the historical, social, cultural, economic and political as well as personal[8] aspects of life.  The gospel could, therefore, be described as how the life of Christ relates to us in all circumstances of life. The Apostle Paul also summarizes the basic elements of the Gospel in 1 Corinthians 15:1-8. Paul writes ‘…that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the scriptures’.[9] Therefore, the gospel in my opinion is the Good News of Jesus that brings holistic redemption to man. It brings about the renewal of the soul and body of the individual and the community as a whole. With the understanding that the gospel brings us the message of God’s total identification with humanity, we can then say that the gospel is the ‘person of Jesus Christ of Nazareth’[10] and the continuation of his life in the work of the church and all other aspects of human life in the context of our culture.  
WHAT IS CULTURE?
Culture has its origins in God. It began in the Garden of Eden when God created the male and female and endowed them with moral and social values and the capability to develop patterns of behavior and evolve ways of life. Cultural practices handed over from the patriarch have evolved, and changed, some are suppressed and others have been eradicated. Yet to a large extent, elements of culture still persist in most societies. The word is derived from the French word culture and Latin cultura, meaning to grow, or cultivate.
Culture can be likened to a tree. The most important elements are hidden underneath and largely invisible to outsiders. Such elements are the history, beliefs, ideology; that are hardly understood unless explained. The surface elements include ways of dressing, arts, traditions, rituals, which have also been identified by Kwame Bediako in his definition of culture. He also asserts that culture relates to how persons and their social groupings think and understand themselves in their physical and spiritual environment. This includes ‘political organizations, notions of leadership, authority, power and rule as well as religion and moral values and things deemed acceptable and unacceptable’.[11]
Paul Hiebert defines culture as ‘more or less integrated systems of beliefs, feelings and values and their associated symbols, pattern of behavior and products’.[12] The WCC assembly in Nairobi in 1975, attempted to define culture as ‘people’s style of life, the way people think, behave and live together and that which in this sense continues to mold the way of life of the people’.[13]
It is obvious from the definitions above that gospel and culture are inseparable because the gospel is about how Christ relates to all circumstances of life and this is an ‘enduring encounter’[14] as Kwame Bediako posits.
GOSPEL AND CULTURE
As stated by Kwame Bediako, ‘gospel and culture is something that has been going on all the time, and that God has been about this ever since creation’.[15] Our understanding of God’s revelation is related to gospel and culture and therefore gospel and culture are inseparable. God’s self-revelation is linked to actual history of a particular people in the context of their culture. In other words, God’s interaction and relations with Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and their descendants were in their own cultural setting.
Before the New Testament times, a Jewish people with a definite sense of their history, religious traditions, identity and culture, had developed. Their concern was the return of the Kingdom to Israel.[16] It was in this culture that the ‘Word became flesh and dwelt’.[17] This was the beginning of the encounter of gospel and culture in the New Testament. The gospel in the person of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, was born in a Jewish environment dominated by Romans, his manifestation as God in Christ (divinity) took place within the Jewish environment. He spoke the language, followed the customs and traditions, lived and shared in the life experiences of the people; their pain, ignorance, social practices, festivals, religion and philosophy. The ‘Word’ became alive in the culture and shared his God-experience with the people according to their category of thought, their background and mentality. He criticized the negative aspects of their culture and opened their minds to understand important aspects of scripture.[18] Therefore, the person of Jesus Christ as the Gospel; the Son of God, and Savior of the world, embodies the fullest revelation of God to all humanity in a cultural setting. For the gospel to have full meaning it has to be in the context of a culture. Therefore, the gospel becomes our story, our tradition the model that shapes us, through which we see our way of life. It is about conversion of cultures and our entire being, turning over everything that makes us to Christ. At the heart of the gospel is Jesus and the heart of culture is the person.[19] Thus far I have looked at the definition of gospel and culture, I will now turn my attention to 1 Corinthians 8:1-13 and the significance of the issues for pastoral ministry in Africa. 
THE BACKGROUND OF THE CITY OF CORINTH
The city of Corinth was a vibrant commercial centre with a mixed ethnic population of Romans, indigenous Greeks and a strong Jewish community. At the time Paul’s missionary activities began at Corinth, the city was attracting traders everywhere in the empire. Many of the inhabitants were affluent and lived ostentatious lives.
On the religious front, the city housed many gods and cults. These included Aphrodite, Apollo, Demeter among others. Temple prostitution and magic were very prevalent. Several of the people believed in keeping many gods; and there were inscriptions displayed in the city that read ‘I pray to all gods’.[20] The idol worshippers were preoccupied with sacrifices of animals to the gods. They consumed part of the meat and sold the rest at the public market. Sacrifices to idols were an important aspect of their religious life because it was believed that these gods preserved the state and social order. [21] Christians who refused to partake in the worship and sacrificial meals offered to the traditional gods, were branded as haters of humankind.[22]
THE CHURCH IN CORINTH
The church in Corinth was established by Paul on his third missionary journey with the help of Aquila and Priscilla. The church was socially stratified and diverse. It was made up of believers with different levels of maturity in the faith. Some of them were socially-pretentious and self-important individuals who paraded their symbols of self-importance, wisdom and influence in the church and looked down on those with lesser influence.[23] There were heightened disagreements among the believers on issues regarding marriage to unbelievers, lawsuits among believers and sexual immorality among others, that resulted in divisions.[24]
THE FACTIONS IN THE CULTURAL CONTEXT
The factions in the church were of two categories. The ‘strong group’, who felt superior because of their level of knowledge on spiritual things and the new converts, described by Paul as ‘weak’, [25] who were still struggling in the newfound faith and had not gained a full understanding of their salvation and Christ as their final sacrifice.
The strong were a group that understood that meat offered to idols was not harmful to the body, because idols were not real. With the knowledge and liberty they had acquired they condemned those who were not enlightened on such issues. The weak, on the other hand, new Gentiles Christians, were deeply rooted in a culture of idol worship and were not fully persuaded that idols were not real but just figments of imagination and phony. This was an issue Paul addressed to help the Gentile Christians grow.[26]
PAUL’S RESPONSE
Paul was mindful of the cultural context and therefore did not directly condemn the weak in the society for their ‘weak conscience’ that puts them in the category of unbelievers. Rather, Paul addresses the issue in the context of the culture, focusing on love for the neighbor, community living and bringing out the ethical issues bordered on the conscience.  Before this issue came up, it had already been established by the council of elders meeting in Jerusalem that ‘you are to abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from the meat of strangled animals’[27] This was a sin associated to pagan religious festivals and yet taken too lightly by the’ knowledgeable Greeks’. This issue was determined by the council of elders to bring sanity into the community of believers who were practicing syncretism. As Paul writes that ‘all things are lawful, but not all things are expedient. All things are lawful, but not all things edify’.[28] Paul simply means that some actions may not be wrong, but will not be in the interest of others.
Hence, in Paul’s initial response, he pointed at the strong in the church who were puffed up because of knowledge and acted in a proud way over those who were weak in faith and were not sympathetic towards them. This, in Paul’s opinion, was not an expression of love and did not promote community living. To him, knowledge moderated with love was the only way to show that one loves God and is known by Him. It is obvious from Romans 14:15-20 that any act of a believer should not distress a neighbor. It is only on the basis of love that one can sacrifice personal pleasure for the benefit of another. Ethical altruism holds that individuals have a moral obligation to help others. It is therefore, the duty of the strong believers to live for the weak by helping them to reach the stage where they are fully persuaded in their newfound faith.
Paul challenges the proud to be conscious of the conscience of the weaker brother whose faith may be endangered if fellow believers were seen eating in idol temples.[29]  In this context, the strong brother would be intimidating the weak believer who feels compelled to do same, though he knows within, that it is wrong. This results in spiritual destruction because the weak brother’s participation in such food is simply based on intimidation and not on faith. Consequently, his conscience is wounded. Such a sin against the brother is a sin against Christ as well, whose death is beneficial to both the weak and the strong.  
Paul also emphasizes the point that there is only one God, the ultimate source of all creation, and one Lord, Jesus Christ through whom all things came and through whom we live.[30] This is an assurance to the new Christian believers that lordship cannot be ascribed to any crafted gods which are made and that God alone is all knowing, therefore human knowledge is limited.
Finally, Paul indicated his personal position on the issue that he will not eat meat again if it will cause the brother to sin. He will forever refrain from engaging in any harmless practice of eating meat sacrificed to idols if it will ruin his Christian brother. Several lessons learnt from Paul’s response will be helpful to pastoral ministry in Africa.  
SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS ISSUE TO THE PASTORAL MINISTRY IN AFRICA
Pastoral ministry comprises services that include care and counseling by pastors and other religious leaders to members of their church or anyone within the institutional setting. The pastoral ministry operates in culture and the cultural context is important to an effective and successful ministry. In Africa, there are diverse traditions and cultural practices that believers are still affiliated with, just like the weak believers in the context of the church at Corinth. However, these are not to be condemned outright. The gospel should be allowed to heal and transform the culture and make up for its limitations. Africans are also conscious of external issues; therefore a deeper understanding of the elements of culture will greatly help in communicating Christ in the African context. Addressing external issues only will eliminate the missionary focus.
In interpreting scripture, it is important to understand the cultural context of the text and its implication to the people in the context. Similarly, it is also important to understand the existing milieu of the recipients and the perspectives illuminated by the gospel in order not to have any believer bedeviled. Again,  Pastors are to remember that people of other cultures also hold on to certain beliefs as the truth by their own definition and standard and pastors are to be aware of this.[31]
It is also important to be mindful of the various levels of spiritual maturity among members of the community of faith. As Paul stated, some believers are ‘puffed up by the knowledge’ they have acquired and thus look down upon the weak brothers. This normally results in differences of opinion, personality clashes and weakness of faith. Pastors are also to be watchful not to be puffed up by their level of knowledge. This will obviously break down the sheepfold. 
Pastoral ministry has the task to listen patiently to people whose ways of looking at things are radically different and paying attention to diverse opinions in humility.[32]
CONCLUSION
In this essay, I have tried to define gospel and culture and I have been able to indicate that the terms gospel and culture are inseparable as stated by Kwame Bediako. On the basis of this, I looked at the issue relating to food sacrificed to idols in 1Corintians 8:1-13. It is obvious that there are people with different levels of maturity in the church and the strong are not to despise the weak on the basis of their knowledge for “not everyone has this knowledge’[33] of spiritual things. Again, the weak should also not be compelled to engage in matters that will affect their conscience. The key question is ‘what effect will my action have on the unbeliever and a weaker believer’?  

Bibliography
Adeyemo, Tokunboh, African Bible Commentary (China: World Alive Publishers,2006)
Bediako, Kwame, ‘Gospel and Culture: Some Insights from the Experience of the Early Church’, Journal of African Christian Thought, Vol. 2., No.2( December 1999).

Bediako, Kwame, ‘What is Gospel?’,Asempa Jubilee Lectures, Christ the King Church Hall, Accra 27 to 29 September 1995.

Garland, David E., 1 Corinthians, Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament (Grand Rapids:Baker Academic, 2003). 

Hiebert, Paul G., ‘Cultural Differences and Communication of the Gospel’,in Ralph D. Winter (eds.), Perspectives on the World Christian Movement (United Kingdom: Paternoster Press, 1999),pp.374-383.

Hornby, A. S., Oxford Advance Learner’s Dictionary.

Loewen, Jacob A.,The Bible in Cross-Cultural Perspective ( California: William Carey Library:2000).

Lundstrom, Klas, Gospel and Culture in the World Council of Churches and the Lausanne Movement (Uppsala 2006).

Mounce William D., and Robert H. Mounce, Greek and English Interlinear New Testament (United States: Zondervan, 2008).

The Holy Bible, King James Version.

Thompson, Della, The Concise Oxford Dictionary (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

Walls, Andrew F., The Cross-Cultural process in Christian History (Maryknoll: Orbis Books, 2002).





[1]Della Thompson, The Concise Oxford Dictionary (Oxford: Clarendon Press), p.586.
[2]A. S Hornby, Oxford Advance Learner’s Dictionary.
[3] William D. Mounce and Robert H. Mounce, Greek and English Interlinear New Testament (United States: Zondervan, 2008), p. 1104.
[4] John 3:16.
[5] Klas Lundstrom, Gospel and Culture in the World Council of Churches and the Lausanne Movement (Uppsala 2006),p. 83.
[6] Lundstrom, Gospel and Culture in the World Council of Churches and the Lausanne Movement, p.83.
[7] Kwame Bediako, ‘Gospel and Culture: Some insights from the experience of the early church’. Journal of African Christian Thought, Vol. 2, No.2, (December 1999),p.8.
[8] Kwame Bediako, ‘What is Gospel?’,Asempa Jubilee Lectures, Christ the King Church Hall, Accra 27 to 29 September 1995.
[9] 1 Corinth. 15:4-5.
[10]Kwame Bediako, ‘Gospel and Culture: Some Insights from the Experience of the Early Church’ ,p. 8.
[11] Kwame Bediako, ‘Gospel and Culture: Some Insights from the Experience of the Early Church’ ,p. 8.
[12] Paul G. Hiebert, ‘Cultural Differences and Communication of the Gospel’, in Ralph D. Winter, Perspectives on the World Christian movement (United Kingdom: Paternoster Press, 1999), p.374.
[13]Lundstrom, Gospel and Culture, p.85.
[14] Bediako, ‘Gospel and Culture: Some insights from the Experience of the Early Church’, p. 8.
[15] Bediako, ‘Gospel and Culture: Some insights from the Experience of the Early Church’, p. 8.
[16] Acts 1:6.
[17] John 1:14.
[18] Luke 24: 13-52.
[19] Bediako, Gospel and Culture: Some Insights from the experience of Early Church, p. 8-12.
[20]David E. Garland, 1Corinthians: Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2003), p. 9.
[21] Garland, 1 Corinthians: Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament, p.10.
[22] Garland, 1 Corinthians: Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament, p. 10.
[23] Garland, 1 Corinthians: Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament, p.4. 
[24] 1 Corinth.1:10.
[25] 1 Corinth. 8:10.
[26] David E. Garland, 1 Corinthians, Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament ( Grand Rapids : Baker Academic, 2003)
[27] Acts 15:29.
[28] 1 Corinth. 10:23.
[29] Tokunboh Adeyemo, African Bible Commentary (China: World Alive Publishers,2006),p. 1387.
[30] 1 Corinth. 8:6.
[31] Paul G. Hiebert, ‘Cultural Differences and the Communication of the Gospel’, p. 381.
[32] Jacob A. Loewen, The Bible in Cross-Cultural Perspective ( California: William Carey Library:2000)
[33] 1Corinth 8:7.